Those Who Can See will regretfully be closing up shop for a period of research. We hope to be back online as soon as possible. Happy New Year to those who can see, to those who cannot, and to those whose eyes are just beginning to open.
02 January 2014
11 December 2013
There is a widespread feeling that the segregationists of yesteryear (in both North and South) were profoundly different than us: immoral, misguided, perhaps even brainwashed. We are unable to imagine what could have possibly pushed them to embrace these discriminatory policies. But it need it not be so: They wrote their reasons down in books. Let us then look more closely, and see
1) if their beliefs were based on fact or fantasy, and
2) if they are truly as alien to us today as we have been led to believe.
The first place we'll look at is the one closest to us--our neighborhoods.
After Emancipation and especially in the lead-up to WWI, Afro migration to cities (both North and South) exploded. Those Whites who had fought hard to end slavery sang a different tune when the objects of their affection moved in next door. A 1919 Chicago study found that:
No single factor has complicated the relations of Negroes and whites in Chicago more than the widespread feeling of white people that the presence of Negroes in a neighborhood is a cause of serious depreciation of property. When a Negro family moves into a block in which all other families are white, the neighbors object. This objection may express itself in studied aloofness, in taunts, warnings, slurs, threats, or even the bombing of their homes.' White neighbors who can do so are likely to move away at the first opportunity.
[...] A leading real estate dealer said that "when a Negro moves into a block the value of the properties on both sides of the street is depreciated all the way from $100,000 to $500,000 [$1,300,000 to $6,500,000 today], depending upon the value of the property in the block"; that it was a fact and that there was no escaping it. (1)
Highly desirable neighbors should send property values up; undesirable ones bring them down. Whence this negative reaction to Afros as neighbors? An irrational fear of dark skin? Or something else?
I. Neighborhood upkeep
11 November 2013
The host at Chateau Heartiste kindly shares with us the above schoolwork on White Oppression from our neighbors to the north.
One is led to believe, from this anecdote, that Canada's public transport system is in the throes of a white-on-black harassment wave. Were this true, we would do well to educate ourselves about it.
But is it true? While data on Canada is sparse, for the U.S., where the vast majority of North America's Euros and Afros live, it is plentiful. What can it tell us of these two groups' relations while riding mass transit, today and yesterday?
I. Afros and Transport, Today
1) CITY BUSES
How are white-black relations our nation's city buses?
30 October 2013
25 October 2013
13 October 2013
We've considered the dangers inherent in a multi-ethnic society. One of them is a policy that deserves special attention, because it (1) is getting ever more popular, (2) can lead to disastrous outcomes, and (3) has actual merit from a race-realist perspective. That policy is affirmative action.
We've looked before at its history. Though unpopular amongst conservatives, there are two plausible arguments that could be made in its favor:
I. Natives should restrict foreign immigrant groups' ability to dominate certain institutions.
II. It is a social good to 'insert' members of lower-perfoming groups into roles where they can feel productive.
Our first argument is one for which there is much evidence, both for and against.
28 September 2013
As we have seen, some are hoping fervently for a 'post-racial' West in which we all blend to a mocha color and harmony comes at last. In such a world, so it's thought, we'll see no more prejudice, exclusion, oppression, micro-aggressions, or 'other-ing.' There isn't a social problem, it appears, that cannot be righted by us all becoming beige.
But where is the evidence that tossing diverse ethnies in a pot leads to a happy racial purée? To those who insist it is coming, we at Those Who Can See offer three counter-hypotheses:
(1) No multi-ethnic society will blend smoothly down to one race.
(2) Multi-ethnic societies will always breed inequality, and the more disparate the groups, the more inequality there will be.
(3) The resentments that spring from this can only weaken, not strengthen, society.
For these reasons, we propose that the ideal society is not ethnically diverse, but ethnically homogenous.
* * *
'Ours! ... It was our people! ... Everywhere you saw nothing but this superb brown color that only the loveliest human beings have... [...] Personally, I don't want to be Western. I don't want to be a white Catholic; I'd rather be a black atheist.'
--French Socialist MP (and white Catholic) Jean-Luc Melenchon, describing a political rally full of immigrants
'Look at all the beautiful colours the women here are wearing. Within ten years this is what it is going to look like all over Europe. Back home it’s so bleak and dreary, the colours are devoid of life. ...'
--Swedish Finance Minister Anders Borg, appreciating the aesthetics of Lagos, Nigeria
We see echoes of the 'exoticism' of 18th and 19th century colonialism, where displaying a Chinese painted screen or an Ashanti mask in your drawing room was a sign of status. Today, appropriating not the possessions but the very identity of these 'exotics' has become à la mode.
But let us not be fooled: The light-skinned elite may preach 'marrying out' to the masses, but they avoid it scrupulously among themselves. At the same time, it is rare that high-status men of color have children as dark as or darker than themselves.
Black legends and their wives: Music greats Herbie Hancock and James Brown, sports icons Michael Jordan and Pele, acting legends Sidney Poitier and James Earl Jones (Courtesy of A Field Negro)
Which leads us to the two great color systems the colonial world has known: The one-drop rule and the pigmentocracy. Is there evidence that either one can lead to post-racial paradise?