tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740067042613887004.post526249431153583683..comments2024-03-24T11:47:12.059+01:00Comments on Those Who Can See: The Decapitation of FranceM.G.http://www.blogger.com/profile/06817230141673953233noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740067042613887004.post-77386420035251108672021-09-29T17:44:44.427+02:002021-09-29T17:44:44.427+02:00Are you looking for a positive loan lender to set ...Are you looking for a positive loan lender to set your financial problem free then you would like pedro loan offer, Pedro offer me a loan at the rate of 3% ROI and all process went smoothly as I expected you can email him if you need any kind of loans Email: pedroloanss@gmail.com Or Whatsapp: +18632310632Радомир Эраhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04206444599671821663noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740067042613887004.post-56169439908208660352020-11-03T15:03:12.551+01:002020-11-03T15:03:12.551+01:00blacks and muzzies are two peas in a pod. Whites a...blacks and muzzies are two peas in a pod. Whites allow blacks to attack,murder,assault Whites,White Police, destroy law and order and you WONDER why muzzies and brown people do the same thing. All these 'immigrants" are just emulating and following the hate from black so called leaders,government officials...etc,etc.But keep believing we are all just getting along. What happens when all Whites and White Western Civilization are bred out of existence by blacks. Oh,that's right...peace and tranquility because it's all Whiteys fault and he won't be around anymore. Good job all around cucks.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740067042613887004.post-18799280852516338502020-10-21T23:49:41.042+02:002020-10-21T23:49:41.042+02:00kikz—
Those Charlie cartoons are revolting, and I...kikz—<br /><br />Those <i>Charlie</i> cartoons are revolting, and I think it’s important to show them and to remember that these guys are not some kind of nationalist heroes. They are hard-core leftist atheists who love open-doors immigration. They have been denigrating Catholicism and Catholics in their pages for decades as well as celebrating every kind of deviancy as graphically as possible.<br /><br />Muslims outraged by those cartoons actually have more in common with Catholics than they do with aggressive secularists. Michel Houellebecq’s <i><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submission_(novel)" rel="nofollow">Submission</a></i> predicts a future alliance between the two former at the expense of the latter, and it really has a ring of truth to it.<br /><br />I’ll also add that the <i>Charlie</i> staff refuse to name their attackers—even after death threats, firebombing, and 12 murders!—as ‘Muslim’ or ‘Islamist.’ Their <a href="https://www.francebleu.fr/infos/faits-divers-justice/enseignant-tue-dans-les-yvelines-charlie-hebdo-exprime-un-sentiment-d-horreur-et-de-revolte-1602923137" rel="nofollow">latest statement</a> after the teacher’s beheading refers to ‘assassination by a <b>religious fanatic</b>’ and the dangers of the ‘intolerance’ of this ‘<b>fascist ideology</b>.’ That’s right, just a regular old garden variety ‘religious fanatic,’ no religion in particular! For as much as they poke fun at Muslims, they are true jacobins who see absolutely no difference between Islam and Christianity and would be thrilled to see the last priest strangled with the entrails of the last imam. They are not the allies of anyone defending heritage France. What they are useful for is poking the Islamist bear and opening the eyes of French normies to just how dangerous this hostile foreign colony really is.M.G.https://www.blogger.com/profile/06817230141673953233noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740067042613887004.post-11609553991861282312020-10-21T23:23:05.987+02:002020-10-21T23:23:05.987+02:00rzg—
May I humbly request that your next blog pos...rzg—<br /><br /><i>May I humbly request that your next blog post be a concrete policy proposal for handling the Durka Question (DQ).</i><br /><br />Indeed you are right. <i>TWCS</i> has always been of the philosophy that good policy is 90% knowing what’s actually happening, and 10% knowing what to do about it. This blog has usually focused on the former, since today’s policy makers exist in a fog of ignorance on even the most basic facts of sociology, ethnology, and biology.<br /><br />That said, I accede to your request and hereby promise that the next article published here will dig into policy proposals on this very thorny question.M.G.https://www.blogger.com/profile/06817230141673953233noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740067042613887004.post-14825974370156742722020-10-21T23:08:40.331+02:002020-10-21T23:08:40.331+02:00Coyote—
Muslims appear to have a unique problem ...Coyote—<br /><br /><i> Muslims appear to have a unique problem with the sheer scale of their own religious extremism. … tolerant Muslim countries are much rarer. Kazakhstan is a rare example of this.</i><br /><br />My sense is that most Muslim countries that were subjected to communism came out with a less fundamentalist faith. Very interesting link from Razib.<br /><br /><i>IMHO, France should have been EXTREMELY selective with the Muslims that it imported. The only Muslims who should have been welcome in France are liberals, progressives, and freethinkers.</i> <br /><br />Things just didn’t turn out as planned. The Arabs they imported to rebuild after the war were (1) largely men and (2) expected to go back to Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia once the work was done. But they got comfy, and in the 1970s the famous “family reunification” policy meant that each one could bring in 30 relatives, and here we are.<br /><br />The other problem is that Muslims actually were more liberal fifty years ago. The whole Muslim world today (including in Europe) is undergoing a kind of reverse-Enlightenment, where Wahabi-style fundamentalism is spreading like wildfire. Even if you import “free-thinkers”, there’s no guarantee that their kids or grandkids won’t be calling for Sharia.<br /><br /><i>It would be best for all involved for immigrants and refugees to settle in countries that they are actually culturally compatible with.</i><br /><br />The asylum treaties applicable in Europe were written in the aftermath of WW2, with European refugees in mind. No one then could have fathomed that one day millions of Africans and Asians would use them to muscle their way into Europe, most coming from countries not even at war, and live off of generous welfare benefits for years. Sane voices today are calling for scrapping these treaties and starting from scratch.<br /><br /><i>I mean, I certainly would enjoy some Chinese, Hindus, and Sikhs spicing up my neighborhood, but I'd be much warier with Muslims or Africans. Sure, there are some good Muslims and Africans … but being much more selective with these groups would certainly be extremely nice.</i><br /><br />Everyone’s got their own tolerance level for cultural difference, from the Japanese ‘sorry, we’re closed’ to the American ‘open-house’ approach. But if you enjoy ‘some’ Chinese, Hindus, and Sikhs, just remember that these people rarely stay at just a few. As soon as they have a toehold, they form a colony and will import as many of their confreres as possible. Culture is people: at some point your customs and folkways disappear in favor of theirs. As with so many things, spice is no longer spice when it becomes the whole stew.<br /><br />Thanks for your interesting comments and the links.M.G.https://www.blogger.com/profile/06817230141673953233noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740067042613887004.post-43118147305534174812020-10-21T22:04:05.974+02:002020-10-21T22:04:05.974+02:00thank you... first other reprint of that 'Dadd...thank you... first other reprint of that 'Daddies' toon. that's my go to when referencing hebdo's general nastiness. France is on her knees.... arise Eruopa, reclaim your lands.kikzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13345790256261244077noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740067042613887004.post-42714403600623682092020-10-20T13:45:53.165+02:002020-10-20T13:45:53.165+02:00This blog is, and always as been, the humane and m...This blog is, and always as been, the humane and moral touchstone for unflinchingly understanding diversity matters.<br /><br />That being said: recall, dear host, that the front page of your blog is graced with these words:<br /><br />"How should policy change, while respecting human dignity? In education, employment, criminal justice, immigration, foreign policy?"<br /><br />May I humbly request that your next blog post be a concrete policy proposal for handling the Durka Question (DQ).rzgnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740067042613887004.post-69647820720283741312020-10-19T08:49:31.149+02:002020-10-19T08:49:31.149+02:00You see, I'm not opposed to helping out my fel...You see, I'm not opposed to helping out my fellow man--and that includes providing him with exit options in order to escape tyranny and/or oppression. However, I also think that it would be best for all involved for immigrants and refugees to settle in countries that they are actually culturally compatible with. The US has managed to handle immigrant diversity relatively well (at least, it had less bad apples in comparison to Western Europe, and native-born US blacks--full of bad apples--aren't immigrants), and even managed to have a Diversity Visa Lottery for 30 years without too many problems:<br /><br />https://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/cheap-assault-immigration-visa-lottery<br /><br />However, Western European countries needed and still need more nationalism because diversity has worked out less well for them. I mean, I certainly would enjoy some Chinese, Hindus, and Sikhs spicing up my neighborhood, but I'd be much warier with Muslims or Africans. Sure, there are some good Muslims and Africans (such as--generally--the chill Persians in southern California and the more educated and/or talented African immigrants who come to the US, and who are generally much more peaceful than native-born US blacks are), but being much more selective with these groups would certainly be extremely nice.Coyotehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01184822261811827197noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740067042613887004.post-52976694306425780512020-10-19T08:43:50.648+02:002020-10-19T08:43:50.648+02:00IMHO, France should have been EXTREMELY selective ...IMHO, France should have been EXTREMELY selective with the Muslims that it imported. The only Muslims who should have been welcome in France are liberals, progressives, and freethinkers. Maybe I would have made an exception for those harkis who would have shared these specific values; the ones who didn't should have probably been resettled in a more culturally compatible country, such as Tunisia or Morocco. (It was too dangerous for the harkis in Algeria after independence due to their previous support of France and French rule over Algeria.)<br /><br />Ditto for this Chechen. He might have been a MUCH better fit in, say, Afghanistan or Pakistan than he would have in France. Why didn't those countries accept Chechen refugees?Coyotehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01184822261811827197noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1740067042613887004.post-8469321597152211622020-10-19T08:40:21.754+02:002020-10-19T08:40:21.754+02:00Letting in all of those Muslims to France over the...Letting in all of those Muslims to France over the last several decades was certainly a mistake. And people wonder why exactly Eastern Europe doesn't want Muslim immigrants--it's because of crap like this happening over and over and over and over again!<br /><br />Sam Harris is absolutely correct in regards to Islam. Of course, all religions have their nuts (Christians in Uganda jailing and murdering gay people, Hindus killing people for eating beef, et cetera), but Muslims appear to have a unique problem with the sheer scale of their own religious extremism. While there are a lot of fundamentalist Christian countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, for instance, there are also plenty of much more tolerant Western and Latin American Christian countries. In contrast, tolerant Muslim countries are much rarer. Kazakhstan is a rare example of this.<br /><br />The data here might be of interest to you:<br /><br />https://www.unz.com/gnxp/smite-the-unbelievers/<br /><br />Look, I will admit that Mr. Paty was an ass for showing *that specific* Muhammad cartoon. However, being an ass certainly DOES NOT MEAN THAT ONE SHOULD BE MURDERED AND DECAPITATED! The Chechen guy who killed him ended up quite literally being a billion times worse of an ass and a monster than Mr. Paty--who never actually physically harmed anyone--ever was!<br /><br />Honestly, the only positive thing out of this is that this Chechen guy subsequently ended up getting killed by the French police. If I lived in France, I might very well vote for Marine Le Pen in 2022 because in spite of me being wary of her, I WANT TO PUT RADICAL ISLAMISTS IN THEIR PLACE! I have no problem with moderate Muslims (such as the chill Persians in southern California) but I do have an extremely serious problem with religious nuts--especially those who actually support harming and/or killing people for harmless things and activities! :(Coyotehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01184822261811827197noreply@blogger.com